home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT1669>
- <title>
- Nov. 28, 1994: Government:The Dynamic New Buzz Word
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- Nov. 28, 1994 Star Trek
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- GOVERNMENT, Page 32
- The Dynamic New Buzz Word
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p> `Dynamic scoring' sounds like something composers or quarterbacks
- do. But in fact it's the hottest buzz word from the realm of
- Republican legislators, who hope to use the economic technique
- to justify tax cuts. Already the term has ignited a controversy.
- Laura D'Andrea Tyson, the President's chief economist, calls
- the concept "dangerous." But Republican John Kasich of Ohio,
- who is expected to head the House Budget Committee in the new
- Congress, is just as strongly in favor of the idea.
- </p>
- <p> Scoring is a Washington term for estimating the impact of changes
- in tax and spending policy on federal revenue. Traditionally,
- economists and estimators use "static scoring," in which a cut
- or increase in taxes is presumed to have a directly proportional
- effect on revenues. In other words, if taxes are cut 10%, revenues
- fall 10%. Thus fiscal responsibility demands that tax cuts be
- paired with matching cuts in spending.
- </p>
- <p> The dynamic-scoring models hold that a 10% tax cut may boost
- economic activity by lifting the yoke of taxation off workers
- and businesses, which affects not only their own behavior but
- the performance of the economy as well. Increased economic activity
- means that the government's incoming revenues might actually
- be enhanced by tax cuts. Thus, using the dynamic-scoring model,
- tax cuts don't always require matching spending cuts.
- </p>
- <p> Liberals charge that dynamic scoring is a latter-day version
- of Reagan-era voodoo economics, a way of slashing taxes without
- making painful budget cuts. Says Tyson: "We have just gained,
- after more than a decade, some credibility with financial markets
- through the hard-won credibility and sanity of our fiscal policy.
- This is not the moment to change." But Republicans argue that
- they have an example of how dynamic scoring could have predicted
- failure: the luxury tax of 1990, which produced disappointing
- revenues because it crushed the boat industry.
- </p>
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-